(Viewed 1,202 times)

[eanassir]

The fireballs of Russia were pieces of a flaming comet

1- They came all of a sudden and unexpectedly.
2- There were many fireballs with very bright light more than the sun disc.
3- They were accompanied by tremendous blasts.
4- They were attracted to the frozen regions.


www.google.iq/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDEQtwIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3De686-i7woR4&ei=QJlyUfyHDcj74QTMyoGICg&usg=AFQjCNHDhOp0-TFpXdZrcxyqo4nQPMYrqw&sig2=WZrBQzGqKY8wU4LKbQSsyA&bvm=bv.45512109,d.Yms

[eanassir]

For more differentiation between the flaming comet and the meteoritic rock, see these two links:
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#Comets
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Meteorites

[eanassir]

I also inserted in this link many valuable pictures derived from many you tubes:
quran-ayat.com/huda/showthread.php?4432-%CF%D1%C7%D3%C9-%C7%E1%E4%CC%E3-%C7%E1%CB%C7%DE%C8&p=10382&viewfull=1#post10382

[eanassir]

See this wonderful picture of this horrible comet lighting this Russian village:
The fourth picture in this group of pictures.

quran-ayat.com/huda/showthread.php?4432-%CF%D1%C7%D3%C9-%C7%E1%E4%CC%E3-%C7%E1%CB%C7%DE%C8&p=10390&viewfull=1#post10390

[patrickm]

"They were attracted to the frozen regions"?!?!
*LOLLLLL*
If that's true, why would they head toward the sun at all? Why not just turn the car around and go slam into Neptune or head to deep space? Can't get much colder than that.

Wow dude. Your F'd up logic isn't even internally consistent.

Glad it didn't hit a Haagen-Dazs factory.

[erikruud]

Apr 21, 2013 21:44:03 GMT -6 patrickm said:

Wow dude. Your F'd up logic isn't even internally consistent.

Patrick, I hope didn't just figure this out about this poster.

Apr 21, 2013 21:44:03 GMT -6 patrickm said:

Glad it didn't hit a Haagen-Dazs factory.

It can hit the Haagen-Dazs factory as long as it doesn't hit our local ice cream shop - Kimmer's Ice Cream

[eanassir]

Apr 21, 2013 21:44:03 GMT -6 patrickm said:

"They were attracted to the frozen regions"?!?!
*LOLLLLL*
If that's true, why would they head toward the sun at all? Why not just turn the car around and go slam into Neptune or head to deep space? Can't get much colder than that.

Yes, comets are attracted to frozen or very cold regions more than they come to hot regions.

See also my thread in this Chicago Astronomer forum:
The fireball of Canada
astronomer.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=gotonewpost&board=comets&thread=2457

The comets impact Moon causing the large number of craters.
quran-ayat.com/huda/showthread.php?492-The-role-of-the-Moon-in-protecting-the-Earth

And it impacted Siberia in the year 1908
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#The_Comet_of_Tunguska

While the rocks of meteorites may fall on any region in the Earth.

[patrickm]

Apr 22, 2013 13:17:25 GMT -6 erikruud said:

Apr 21, 2013 21:44:03 GMT -6 patrickm said:

Wow dude. Your F'd up logic isn't even internally consistent.

Patrick, I hope didn't just figure this out about this poster.

No of course not but this was the first time that it hit me in a way that prompted a response for some reason. I was pretty sleep deprived from last week's storms and then Record Store Day, so I must have had my guard down. Hopefully my last. I am old and know too well to not waste time with trolls and bad Sci-Fi posters

Using his criteria, I think our cat must be part comet. Perhaps we should change her name.

p

[Paulie pchris00]

Apr 22, 2013 22:17:59 GMT -6 patrickm said:

Using his criteria, I think our cat must be part comet. Perhaps we should change her name.

Comet would then be among the most popular names of my friends's cats.


Also, I don't condone comets or fragments of comets falling on any ice cream factories or parlors.

[eanassir]

Correction of the mistake of astronomers about comets:

>> The origin of comets is from the sun, not from the periphery of the solar system (or the Oort cloud.)
>> They are sparks or fire masses hurled out of the sun, following some solar explosions.
>> Then they start roaming in the space. They do not circle around the sun.
>> They are oblong not spherical; therefore, they do not rotate around themselves (as do hot spherical objects usually do).
>> They are not dirty ice (which is very ridiculous and funny: how can any scientist think in this way!?
And how can others follow them blindly in this way!?)

>> They have a predilection or affinity to the cold and frozen regions on Earth, planets and moons (the attraction between the hot and the cold objects.)

www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#Comets

[erikruud]

Apr 24, 2013 8:49:52 GMT -6 eanassir said:

Correction of the mistake of astronomers about comets:

>> They are not dirty ice (which is very ridiculous and funny: how can any scientist think in this way!?
And how can others follow them blindly in this way!?)

I know this probably won't get you to change your mind, but I am posting it here so that others can see.

The common conception of comets as dirty snowballs needs revising, but they are not flaming. Scientists know this because we have sent space probes out to pass near comets and they sent back pictures. One of those probes, Star Dust, even passed through the tail of a comet and returned to earth with samples of the particles in the tail.

Here is a link to an image comparing the shape and size of two comets.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tempel_1_Hartley_2_comparison.jpg

[Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe]

I detested the "Dirty Snowball" analogy...like forever.

Frosty hunk of rock is better.

Religious dogma can never be utilized for scientific explanations, as the writers knew nothing of quasi-modern empirical reasoning and attempted to explain the environment around them in terms of the day.

Fire requires oxygen, space is a virtual vacuum.

No...there is no fire in space.

Charged Plasma...now that's something else.

[eanassir]

Apr 24, 2013 9:22:45 GMT -6 erikruud said:

The common conception of comets as dirty snowballs needs revising, but they are not flaming.

Thanks to God, that they now think it reasonable to revise their past mistake of the "dirty snow"

It is part of the sun, which is very hot, and we said "flaming" : it is only a matter of expression: I mean it is part of the solar body: which has a nuclear activity. This explains why the comet keeps to be very hot for some considerable time: until it reaches the Earth and the other planets and moons.

Apr 24, 2013 9:22:45 GMT -6 erikruud said:

Scientists know this because we have sent space probes out to pass near comets and they sent back pictures. One of those probes, Star Dust, even passed through the tail of a comet and returned to earth with samples of the particles in the tail.

There is much confusion and overlapping about the difference between : the comet, the meteorite, the meteor, the asteroid.

www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Meteorites
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Meteors
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#Comets
www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_2.htm#Asteroids

What they saw and investigated looks like some asteroid or meteoritic rock rather than a comet which is a flaming object, or plasma as do some astronomers here call.

The thing that makes many men here hesitating is the "religion."

But it is not any religion; it is the religion of God:

Even the most of Muslims object to it and don't believe in this interpretation of the Quran: which was inspired into the late interpreter of the Quran and Bible: Mohammed-Ali Hassan Al-Hilly, who only knew writing and reading Arabic; to the extent that he did not graduate at any primary school even.

Apr 24, 2013 9:22:45 GMT -6 erikruud said:

Here is a link to an image comparing the shape and size of two comets.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tempel_1_Hartley_2_comparison.jpg

This is not any comet: it is almost an asteroid or a meteoritic rock.

[eanassir]

Apr 24, 2013 12:42:34 GMT -6 Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe said:

I detested the "Dirty Snowball" analogy...like forever.

This was their past theory or postulation.

Apr 24, 2013 12:42:34 GMT -6 Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe said:

Frosty hunk of rock is better.

This is the meteoritic rock or the asteroid.

Apr 24, 2013 12:42:34 GMT -6 Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe said:

Religious dogma can never be utilized for scientific explanations, as the writers knew nothing of quasi-modern empirical reasoning and attempted to explain the environment around them in terms of the day.

He knew nothing of quasi-modern scientific explanations: right.
But those who knew ... did not realize it!
whereas he that was not graduated at any school ... he gave a better explanation.

Apr 24, 2013 12:42:34 GMT -6 Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe said:

Fire requires oxygen, space is a virtual vacuum.

No...there is no fire in space.

Charged Plasma...now that's something else.

The comet is part of the solar body: it may preserve some nuclear activity, which was detected in the site of the Tunguska impact in Siberia.

www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_3.htm#The_Comet_of_Tunguska