(Viewed 2,413 times)

[eanassir]

Joe, the Chicago Astronomer
Hello
I think that the recent images obtained by NASA are not precise. They are computer-mediated through some program which may be defective. They are different from the photograph taken directly by the ordinary camera. It may be so that, for example, some images revealing a dark area and it may be a large city or a big forest. Probably, such images are not so precise. Eventhough we know that many brilliant scientists and researchers are working there with NASA. I think this idea is worth to be transmitted to NASA or other related groups.

With best regards.

eanassir
[e-mail]

[Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe]

Eanassir,

Please post which recent NASA image(s) you are referring to and let's see.

[eanassir]

Joe, Chicago Astronomer
I say it may be, in case the computer program of picking and transferring the images is defective, then all the images, probably, may be not so precise; but see in particular the recent dark hole with sunlight on some of its wall, and the face picture with different views on different occasions.

eanassir.

[Centaur]

admin said:

Eanassir,

Please post which recent NASA image(s) you are referring to and let's see.

Thanks for demanding real evidence, Joe. The poster has initiated several threads recently in which he supports his wishful thinking by deferring to the “authority” of some writer’s fanciful interpretations of religious scripture. Both the poster and his source need to learn the Scientific Method and understand how it tends to get us closer to the truth than wild imaginings do alone. I had avoided making replies to his earlier threads on the assumption that no one here would be persuaded by his arguments.

[Chicago Astronomer - Astro Joe]

I don't mind theories, ideas and conjectures. Just provide more than one source and supportive evidence.

Even way out claims are cool.

At one time the idea of little critters making us sick was considered way out.

[eanassir]

The indications, that what I have said is true, are:

• Different light wavelenghts have been used in picking these images.
  
• There has been certain computer program in picking and transmitting such images.
  
• These images are not the "raw" pictures; but the raw pictures have been modified by some processing procedure; because the raw images are not so clear.
  I say go and check, to see that this is true, and see the original raw pictures which are obtainable at NASA sources.
  When I say this, I insist that the specialists and researchers there are doing their best, but this is the real condition.
  

eanassir.

[Maddad]

We do not know what image is involved because Eanassir has not communicated that information. I guess though that he is thinking of the Face on Mars. Viewed at some angles and under some lighting conditions, it did resemble a human face. Additional inspection showed this to be just a result of the positioning of the camera.